top of page

When Small Means Steady: Namibia’s Stability Beside South Africa’s Scale 
 

Despite shared borders, trade, and currency ties, Namibia and South Africa follow different growth paths shaped by scale, structure, and strategy.

Helvetica Light is an easy-to-read font, with tall and narrow letters, that works well on almost every site.

Key Takeaways:

  • South Africa is the largest economy in Africa, but Namibia’s small size allows for nimble policy and targeted investment, highlighting the trade-off between scale and stability.
     

  • South Africa’s service-led economy cushions it against shocks, whereas Namibia’s primary-sector reliance offers growth potential but increases vulnerability to global commodity swings. Namibia risks the “resource curse,” so converting mineral wealth into broader economic sectors is critical for long-term resilience.
     

  • Namibia’s high, targeted FDI shows investor confidence in stable policies, while South Africa’s lower but diversified FDI underscores the value of spreading investment risk.
     

  • Both countries struggle with high unemployment, but Namibia’s rural and resource-dependent economy makes job creation more challenging.
     

  • Namibia’s dependence on South Africa for exports and its focus on raw commodities shows the vulnerability of resource-based economies in value-chain dynamics.

Two neighbours: two models of growth

Despite their close trade links and monetary system, Namibia and South Africa show two distinct models of economic development — one defined by scale, the other by stability.

​

South Africa’s economy is vast, diversified, and deeply integrated into global value chains. In 2024, South Africa’s GDP was estimated at USD $400 billion at current prices - the largest economy in Africa. But that scale has also come with volatility and uncertainty: growth is constrained by persistent infrastructure bottlenecks, power supply issues, and policy uncertainty. It’s an economy big enough to absorb shocks, but also big enough to amplify them.​

1.png

Namibia, by contrast, is small — about 3% of South Africa’s economic size — yet remarkably stable. Its growth is steadier, it has high levels of Foreign Direct Investment (a key metric of investor confidence), and its fiscal and monetary management are relatively disciplined. Its smallness forces focus: targeted Foreign Direct Investment (FDI) in mining, energy, and logistics, pragmatic fiscal strategy, and tighter institutional cohesion. Namibia has also experienced greater GDP growth over time, while GDP growth in South Africa has largely stagnated: between 1990 and 2024, GDP growth in Namibia averaged 3.43%, and 2% in South Africa. 

2.png

Economic composition shapes resilience and exposure to risk

South Africa’s economy is dominated by the tertiary sector and services, including Business and Financial Services, Government Services and Personal Services (which include education and healthcare). In the last quarter, services contributed 54% of South Africa’s GDP, and 45% of Namibia’s GDP.  Namibia, in contrast, has a much higher proportion of GDP from primary sectors, such as Agriculture and Mining. South Africa’s service-dominated economy reflects a more mature, diversified economy that can better withstand commodity cycles.The diamond industry in Namibia is a prime example of this: Namibia is a major producers of diamonds, but a combination of tariff pressures, increased competition from lab-grown diamonds and reduced global demand have slashed prices. In 2024, diamond mining contracted by 3.7%, while diamond processing contracted by 26.5%. This trend is expected to continue in the future. 

 

Namibia’s heavier reliance on primary industries such as mining, while offering strong export potential, makes it more vulnerable to external shocks — but also positions it to benefit from the recent surge in global interest in critical minerals and energy resources. Countries endowed with rich natural resource deposits often fall foul to the “resource curse”, where an economy relies too heavily on the natural resources, making it vulnerable to commodity price swings, or collapse if the resource runs out. However, a number of countries, rich in natural resources, have successfully diversified their economies, growing their manufacturing and services industries and thus benefitting from natural resources, while building a sustainable, resilient economy. Namibia’s challenge is then to convert resource wealth into service-sector depth.

4.png

Focused investment and policy discipline attract investor confidence

Namibia has seen considerably higher Foreign Direct Investment (FDI) as a percentage of GDP than South Africa. FDI is an important metric showing investor confidence in an economy. Since 2000, FDI in Namibia has been, on average, 6% of GDP. Namibia’s government has worked hard to signal stability and creditworthiness, recently paying off a USD$750 million eurobond in one day. This investment into Namibia, especially in recent years, has largely been driven by investments in mining. The recent discovery of major offshore oil reserves in the Orange Basin, located between Namibia and South Africa, has attracted significant foreign investment in Namibia, with energy companies such as Shell and TotalEnergies commencing exploration activities in the region. Namibia shows that clear strategy can attract investors even in small markets — but concentration risk remains.


In South Africa, on the other hand, FDI has averaged only 1.7% of GDP. But, although FDI is lower in South Africa, it is more diversified: according to the TIPS FDI Tracker, in Q1 2025, FDI flowed to the agriculture, mining, manufacturing, services and utilities sectors. This is important because, in general, diversified FDI reduces the risk of major FDI contractions if one sector collapses. It can also encourage more sustainable growth, rather than relying on one industry.

3.png

High unemployment highlights the limits of growth without inclusion

South Africa and Namibia both struggle with extremely high levels of unemployment. In 2023, the most recent year labour market data is available in Namibia, the broad unemployment rate in South Africa was 40.76% (QLFS, Q4 2023) and 54.80% in Namibia (Namibia Statistics Agency, 2023).

 

Structural unemployment (differences between the skills of the labour market and the skills demanded by the economy) are a major reason for unemployment in both countries. Moreover, a much higher share of Namibians live in rural areas, compared to South Africans. In 2024, 44% of Namibians lived in rural areas, compared with 31% in South Africa (World Bank, 2025). As in South Africa, unemployment rates are higher for those living in rural areas in Namibia. 

 

The make up of the employed population in each country differs too. Most employed people in South Africa work in Retail (20%), Finance and Business Services (17%) or Community and Social Services (23%). Although these sectors are dominant in Namibia too, agriculture is a much more important employer in Namibia than in South Africa, employing over 15% of the working population, compared with 5% in South Africa. 

 

It is also important to note that, despite contributing 12% to Namibia’s GDP, mining is a small employer, employing only 2.60% of Namibia’s employed population in 2023. This is a challenge in resource-rich economies: often extractive industries, which may contribute substantially to GDP and which the country disproportionately relies on, are not large employers.

Unequal trade ties reveal dependence and value-chain imbalance

Namibia and South Africa are close trading partners, but the relationship is unequal. In 2022, only 2.85% of South Africa’s exports were destined for Namibia, a small share of its overall trade, while 14.67% of Namibia’s exports went to South Africa, highlighting Namibia’s much greater dependence on its larger neighbour as a key market (World Bank, 2025).

8.png
6.png
5.png

The top exports from Namibia to South Africa, and vice versa, also highlight a clear value-chain imbalance typical of a larger industrial economy trading with a resource-based neighbour. South Africa’s top exports to Namibia are largely manufactured and higher-value goods, such as machinery, vehicles, electrical equipment, pharmaceuticals, and processed consumer products, reflecting its stronger industrial and technological base.In contrast, Namibia primarily exports raw or semi-processed commodities such as precious metals, live animals, fish, and basic mineral and agricultural products. This pattern shows Namibia’s role as a supplier of primary inputs and South Africa’s position as a regional manufacturing hub, with most value addition occurring on the South African side of the trade relationship.

7.png

Conclusion

South Africa and Namibia are deeply connected, but their economic paths differ. South Africa’s economy is larger and more diversified, supported by a strong services and manufacturing base, yet it faces persistent structural challenges that limit growth. Namibia’s economy is much smaller and more resource-dependent, but it benefits from relative stability, disciplined policy, and a clear focus on attracting targeted investment.

​

Both countries face shared challenges, especially in unemployment and inequality, but from different starting points. For Namibia, the key will be turning resource wealth into broader, inclusive growth; for South Africa, it is about restoring efficiency and confidence in a complex, mature economy. 

References:

Decoding Impact

Disclaimer: The views and opinions expressed on this blog are my own and do not reflect those of my employer. I blog in my personal capacity, and my content is not affiliated with my workplace.

LinkedIn

Share article

bottom of page